It isn't clear that anyone will want to live on formerly contaminated land in an industrial neighborhood.
Underreported: Jersey City Hexavalent ChromiumIn the 1982 the State of New Jersey began investigating the presence of the dangerous chemical hexavalent chromium on a 16-acre site in Jersey City. Today, the site remains contaminated. We’ll talk to Nancy S. Marks, senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, about why it’s taken so long to clean up the site and why the NRDC filed a new lawsuit in February to enforce the clean-up effort.
Would you buy a house and raise kids on land that was supposedly cleaned up? Seriously. Discuss.
Huh, that last little bit is sketchy -- kind of makes the whole deal questionable, i.e. was this the best possible plan for the city, or did they (partially) do it to plug the budget hole.And that rendering is ridiculous.Quote from: MCA on 01-10-2008, 01:58pmThis deal also offers an immediate payoff for an administration trying to cope with this year's budget that ends June 30.Honeywell has agreed to upfront payments of $15 million this year and $10 million next year, money that would come out of the city's 40 percent share on the land sales.[/color][/size]
This deal also offers an immediate payoff for an administration trying to cope with this year's budget that ends June 30.Honeywell has agreed to upfront payments of $15 million this year and $10 million next year, money that would come out of the city's 40 percent share on the land sales.[/color][/size]
The contaminated site of which they speak is that fenced off area across from Home Depot. Isn't this where the mayor wanted to build a warehouse or is that somewhere else?